Li v. Blinken

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that llth Amendment bars claims against state “regardless of whether monetary damages, equitable relief, or retrospective declaratory relief is sought”
• holding that defendants including Pennsylvania DPW, and Pennhurst State School and Hospital — “a state institution” — were entitled to immunity under the Eleventh Amendment
• holding that the Eleventh Amendment bars federal courts from enjoining state officials from violating state law
• holding that federal courts are barred by the Eleventh Amendment from hearing state law claims against state officials in their official capacity under supplemental jurisdiction
• holding that the Eleventh Amendment bars the federal courts from enjoining state actors to comply with state law
• holding that barring waiver by the state, the Eleventh Amendment precludes federal courts from hearing state claims brought against state officials in their official capacities

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).