Li Li v. Canberra Industries

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing grant of employer’s motion for summary judgment on wrongful discharge claim because discharge occurred within months of protected activity
• temporal prox- imity between employee filing complaint and subse- quent discharge may give rise to inference sufficient to establish prima facie case of retaliation
• “Termination within several months of the time the allegedly protected activity occurred may be sufficient to create an inference of causation.”
• “A failure to prove causation defeats the action in any event.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).