L'HOMME v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• if the truthfulness of a prior offense is challenged and the only evidence thereof is hearsay, corroboration of that pri- or conviction is required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Williams v. DHRS
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-11-07· cited 5×
• Banks v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-11-18· cited 4×
• Hamilton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-08-17· cited 3×
• Mulligan v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-09-05· cited 3×
• Williams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-04-11· cited 3×
• Ware v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-04-19· cited 1×
• Farmer v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-04-02· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Davis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-01-29· cited 27×
• Smelley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-12-30· cited 9×
• Camp v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-01-15· cited 8×

Other cases named L'HOMME v. State

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• L'Homme v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-01-05