Lherault, Charles Anthony

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• using the “one central reason” nexus test for a withholding of removal claim
• using the “one central reason” nexus test for a withholding of removal claim
• “The possibility of drawing two inconsistent conclusions from the evidence does not prevent an administrative agency’s finding from being supported by substantial evidence.” (citation omitted)
• “[T]he possibility of drawing two inconsistent conclusions from the evidence does not prevent an administrative agency’s finding from being supported by substantial evidence.” (alteration in original) (citation omitted)
• “The possibility of drawing two inconsistent conclusions from the evidence does not prevent an 2 Case: 20-60368 Document: 00515952065 Page: 3 Date Filed: 07/26/2021 No. 20-60368 administrative agency’s finding from being supported by substantial evidence.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).