Lfc Lessors, Inc. v. Pacific Sewer Maintenance Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that language “courts of Massachusetts” in forum selection clause “was intended to mean that all actions on [the] contract must be brought in Massachusetts state courts”
• the ALJ must discuss significant and probative evidence and 7 explain why it was rejected
• ALJ need not discuss each piece of evidence in the record, but must explain why significant probative 7 evidence has been rejected
• not raising any vagueness issue in addressing clause that required adjudication “in accordance with the law, and in the courts, of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts”
• clause providing that rights and liabilities of parties would be determined by courts \of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts\ precluded federal jurisdiction because construction of clause to include federal district courts would be nonsensical
• \courts . . . of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).