Skip to main content
· 7/7/2011

Leyva v. National Default Servicing Corp.

Citations

  • 255 P.3d 1275
  • 127 Nev. 470
  • 75 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 6
  • 127 Nev. Adv. Rep. 40
  • 2011 Nev. LEXIS 32

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the note and the deed of trust must be held by the same person to foreclose under NRS Chapter 107
  • concluding that \ NRS 107.086 and the FMRs necessitate strict compliance\ to adequately serve the purpose of the statute and rules
  • recognizing that a party in possession of a properly negotiated, endorsed-in-blank promissory note is the note holder and is entitled to enforce the note
  • recognizing that a note holder or a transferee may be entitled to enforce a note
  • recognizing that strict compliance with a statute's requirements may not be necessary when it is not required to achieve the statute's purpose
  • recognizing that substantial compliance may be sufficient when the purpose of a statute's notice requirements is met despite not technically complying with all of the statute's terms

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hardesty, Douglas, Cherry, Saxtta, Gibbons, Pickering, Parraguirre

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.