Leybourne v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing and dismissing a conviction because mother’s testimony was inadmissible and the evidence was insufficient to prove Leybourne’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt
• reversing and dismissing a conviction because mother's testimony was inadmissible and the evidence was insufficient to prove Leybourne's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt
• rule not applicable to charges of taking indecent liberties with children under Code § 18.2-370
• rule does not apply to charges of taking indecent liberties with children
• rule does not apply to charges of taking indecent liberties with children

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).