Skip to main content
· 5/11/2011

Ley v. Wisconsin Bell, Inc.

Citations

  • 819 F. Supp. 2d 864
  • 24 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1071
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50695
  • 2011 WL 1792918

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to dismiss state law claims against hospital defendants after dismissing federal claims where state law claims against hospital defendants derived from a common nucleus of operative fact as the federal claims remaining against other defendants
  • “[SBUH] is a public institution. Accordingly, the Hospital and its employees are state actors for purposes of Section 1983.”
  • finding no dispute that Stony Brook is a public institution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Griesbach

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.