Lexington Marketing Group, Inc. v. Goldbelt Eagle, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring “clear[] and unmistakabl[e]” delegation of authority to resolve questions of arbitrability
• noting thai Alaska's Arbitration Act reflects strong policy in favor of arbitration
• providing for arbitration when it \is consistent with the parties' intent\
• There is a “presumption that the courts decide whether a dispute is arbitrable under the terms of the agreement.” (emphasis added)
• “[A] court may properly adjudicate claims that the arbitration clause itself is void . . . .”
• “Because the arbitration clause . . . is silent on the proper forum to decide arbitrability, it does not ‘clearly and unmistakably’ rebut the presumption that the courts decide whether a dispute is arbitrable under the terms of the agreement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).