Lexington Ins. Co. v. Western Roofing Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting reduction of damages where subrogation right existed and there “no suggestion that either [the insurer or insured] will potentially enjoy a windfall double recovery”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).