Skip to main content
· 5/31/2001

Lexington Avenue Associates v. Kandell

Citations

  • 283 A.D.2d 379
  • 724 N.Y.S.2d 864
  • 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6580

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The scope of the subject matter which may be considered of ‘public interest’ or ‘newsworthy’ has been defined in most liberal and far-reaching terms.”
  • use was incidental where plaintiff appeared for five seconds of 10-minute broadcast, he did not speak and his name was not given; he and woman were filmed holding hands in broadcast on romance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.