LEWISTON-QUEENSTON BRIDGE

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]hen an individual comes to this country by way of an international bridge, he has ‘landed’ when he touches United States soil.”
• The term \landing\ is a broader concept than that of an \entry.\ \Entry\ requires physical presence plus freedom from actual or constructive official restraint, whereas a \landing\ is ordinarily complete when physical presence occurs.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• ROSAS
  Board of Immigration Appeals· 1999-07-01· cited 63×
• CONNELLY
  Board of Immigration Appeals· 1984-07-01· cited 9×
• Movimiento Democracia, Inc. v. Johnson
  S.D. Florida· 2016-06-28· cited 1×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• PIERRE
  Board of Immigration Appeals· 1973-07-01· cited 98×
• Osaka Shosen Kaisha Line v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1937-02-01· cited 73×
• United States v. Vasilatos
  Third Circuit· 1954-01-07· cited 50×
• United States v. J. H. Winchester & Co.
  Second Circuit· 1930-04-07· cited 26×
• Niven v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 1909-05-03· cited 6×
• M/V SIGNEBORG
  Board of Immigration Appeals· 1960-07-01· cited 4×
• SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD BRIDGE
  Board of Immigration Appeals· 1977-07-01· cited 1×
• NORTHWEST AIRLINES AIRCRAFT
  Board of Immigration Appeals· 1971-07-01· cited 1×
• D
  Board of Immigration Appeals· 1959-07-01· cited 1×