Skip to main content

Lewis v. State

Citations

  • 43 N.E.3d 689
  • 2015 Ind. App. LEXIS 728
  • 2015 WL 7709575

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing the act of fleeing by vehicle and then by foot constitute one continuous act of resisting law enforcement
  • finding similar claim of “one continuous incident” was “[e]ssentially” a double jeopardy argument based on federal constitution
  • Lewis committed one continuous crime when first fleeing in his vehicle and then on foot

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barnes, Kirsch, Najam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.