Skip to main content

Lewis v. State

Citations

  • 346 N.E.2d 754
  • 169 Ind. App. 172
  • 1976 Ind. App. LEXIS 901

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that proof of actual harm from the fraudulent act is “immaterial”
  • holding that proof of actual harm from the fraudulent act is \immaterial\
  • holding that proof of actual harm from the fraudulent act is “immaterial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robertson, Lowdermilk, Lybrook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.