Skip to main content

Lewis v. State

Citations

  • 715 S.W.2d 655
  • 1986 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 766

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating, “[A] burglarious entry made with intent to commit theft is the complete theft, whether any theft is actually perpetrated thereafter.”
  • “It is well settled that the intent to commit theft may be inferred from the circumstances.”
  • defendant‘s presence inside home, in addition to movement of property from a closed cupboard, was sufficient to show an intent to commit theft despite absence of stolen 4 property on defendant‘s person
  • to sustain burglary conviction, it is only necessary to 12 prove the unlawful entry was made for the purpose of committing theft; therefore the State need no prove that the defendant took anything of value after the unlawful entry was made

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Onion

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.