Skip to main content

Lewis v. State

Citations

  • 191 S.W.3d 225
  • 2005 WL 3533118

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that reasonable grounds for testing not present when biological evidence had been destroyed
  • holding that reasonable grounds for testing not present when biological evidence had been destroyed
  • acknowledging that courts of appeals lack “original jurisdiction to grant a writ of habeas corpus in criminal law matters”
  • determining that motion failed to establish reasonable grounds because it failed to show that evidence still exists and that identity was an issue as required by chapter 64
  • holding that original version of Article 64.01(c
  • “If a convicted person who bears the burden of satisfying the requirements of Chapter 64 fails to meet the preconditions to obtaining post-conviction DNA testing, he has failed to set forth reasonable grounds to file a motion and, therefore, is not entitled to the appointment of counsel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sitting: Alma L. Lã“pez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

60 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.