Lewis v. South Carolina

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is somewhat inconsistent for the [defendant] now to assert that [interrogatory] answers were fraudulently incomplete or misleading when it failed to seek either informally or formally any supplementation of the answers.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).