Lewis v. Rumsfeld

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a surreply is most often permitted when the moving party must respond to matters raised for the first time in a reply
• stating that “[t]he standard for granting a leave to file a surreply is whether the party making the motion would be unable to contest matters presented to the court for the first time in the opposing party’s reply”
• denying the petitioner’s motion to file a surreply because it did not involve a new matter but rather an alleged mischaracterization
• denying the petitioner’s motion to file a surreply because it did not involve a new matter but rather an alleged mischaracterization
• denying the petitioner’s motion to file a surreply because it did not involve a new matter but rather an alleged mischaracterization
• denying petitioner’s motion to file a surreply because it did not involve a new matter but rather an alleged mischaracterization

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).