Lewis v. Preschel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding for a new trial because the jury was not instructed to consider “the extent to which the [defendant’s] malpractice, as distinct from the accident-caused initial injury, contributed to the damages proved”
• retrial should only be on allocation of damages because the total dollar damages had already been determined and need not be addressed again

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).