Skip to main content
· 11/24/1891

Lewis v. Oesterreicher

Citations

  • 47 Mo. App. 79
  • 1891 Mo. App. LEXIS 424

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding out-of-court statements on an audiotape identifying the defendant as a drug dealer were inadmissible hearsay
  • where the result of an appeal would have been different had appellate counsel not been deficient, the appropriate remedy is to grant a new trial
  • omission of confidential informant's audio tape identifying defendant during a drug transaction, which if included would have allowed appellate court to find the audio tape should have been excluded as hearsay and order reversal of defendant's convictions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Biggs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.