Lewis v. Nenzel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “because there was a right of appeal from the Bureau’s determination of ineligibility such a determination could not be attacked collaterally in a later proceeding to determine whether or not the overpayments were due to the fault of the recipient”
• “[B]ecause there was a right of appeal from the [Department’s] determination of ineligibility[,] such a determination could not be attacked collaterally in a later proceeding to determine whether or not the overpayments were due to the fault of the recipient.”
• “[B]ecause there was a right of appeal from the [Department’s] determination of ineligibility[,] such a determination could not be attacked collaterally in a later proceeding to determine whether or not the overpayments were due to the fault of the recipient.”
• “[B]ecause there was a right of appeal from the [Department’s] determination of ineligibility[,] such a determination could 5 not be attacked collaterally in a later proceeding to determine whether or not the overpayments were due to the fault of the recipient.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).