Lewis v. Love

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that 2255 relief would be granted in “the rare instances where the sentencing judge thought to make clear that she relied on the residual clause.”
• arguing that dicta in an earlier Eleventh Circuit case was “wrong” where it suggested that a movant arguing that Johnson II invalidates the residual clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) must “prove whether or not [he] was sentenced under the residual clause” (citation omitted)
• criticizing Moore as “wrong” but only dicta, and observing, in dicta, that “[t]he Moore opinion lays out one option. This one lays out another. ... Or perhaps there is another approach out there that neither we nor the Moore panel has considered”
• distinguishing In re Williams from cases that involve monetary penalties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).