Skip to main content
· 10/27/1986

Lewis v. Lockard

Citations

  • 498 N.E.2d 1024
  • 1986 Ind. App. LEXIS 3052

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that Indiana’s statutory workers’ compensation scheme contains “elaborate subrogation provisions” that are “consistent with the strong policy within the Act against double recovery by an injured employee for the same injury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Neal, Robertson, Ratliffe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.