· 10/27/1986
Lewis v. Lockard
Citations
- 498 N.E.2d 1024
- 1986 Ind. App. LEXIS 3052
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that Indiana’s statutory workers’ compensation scheme contains “elaborate subrogation provisions” that are “consistent with the strong policy within the Act against double recovery by an injured employee for the same injury”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Neal, Robertson, Ratliffe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.