Lewis v. Jutkowitz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that subpoena deficient in some limited respects rendering them “technically incomplete” did not render it unlawful because the recipient “would not have been led astray by them.”
• noting the subpoenas did not violate Section 1692(e)(5) because they described an action that legally could be taken

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).