Lewis v. Gehlen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that presumption of irreparable harm was rebutted when plaintiff delayed 18 months after learning of defendant’s allegedly infringing conduct before filing suit and seeking a preliminary injunction
• recognizing that eBay “reject[ed] the presumption of irreparable harm in patent cases”
• opining that the “longest such delay ever permitted by the Seventh Circuit appears to be nine months.”
• acknowledging the “well-established presumption that injuries arising from Lanham Act violations are irreparable, even absent a showing of business loss.”
• precluding a finding of irreparable harm due to unexplained eighteen-month delay
• measuring delay from the time Redbox “learned of [defendant’s] red kiosks”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).