Lewis v. Family Planning Management, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a contempt proceeding to enforce an order constitutes a separate proceeding and distinguishing Laurent
• noting that a contempt proceeding to enforce an order constitutes a separate proceeding and distinguishing Laurent
• discovery orders are not appealable under Rule 301, 304, 306, or 307, and are only appealable under Rule 308 if certain conditions are met
• discovery orders are not appealable under Rule 301, 304, 306, or 307, and are only appealable under Rule 308 if certain conditions are met
• order compelling answers to deposition questions was discovery order “not within the class of appealable interlocutory orders delineated under [Rule] 307.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).