Lewis v. Emil Clayton Plumbing Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a plumber/customer relationship is not special for nonfeasance duty purposes
• granting summary judgment for defendants where “plaintiffs have not provided evidence to establish the last CCPA element of causation”
• “Plaintiffs have not presented legal authority to support their contention that defendant had a duty to inspect an appliance upon which it was not asked to perform work.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).