Skip to main content
· 3/4/2011

Lewis v. Drouillard

Citations

  • 788 F. Supp. 2d 567
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21942
  • 2011 WL 833790

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • held in abeyance by 6th Cir. Apr. 15, 2011, Order pending the resolution of Jackson and this case
  • held in abeyance by 6th Cir. Apr. 15, 2011, Order pending the resolution of Jackson and this case
  • Because Plaintiffs’ alleged damages are intimately related to their personal injuries, they do not have standing to sue under RICO.”
  • “Because Plaintiffs’ alleged damages are intimately related to their personal injuries, they do not have standing to sue under RICO.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Victoria A. Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.