Skip to main content
· 8/16/1983

Lewis v. Dayton-Hudson Corp.

Citations

  • 339 N.W.2d 857
  • 128 Mich. App. 165

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding no reasonable expectation of privacy exists inside a retail store’s fitting room that is under surveillance
  • \modicum of privacy\ in defendant’s fitting room afforded to customers does not include freedom from overhead observation by a store security guard who is of the same sex as the customers
  • surveillance of plaintiff in department store fitting room
  • surveillance of plaintiff in department store fitting room
  • right of privacy is not absolute
  • right of privacy is not absolute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Danhof, Allen, Hansen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.