Lewis v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that plaintiff’s testimony demonstrating that he had difficulty performing “the normal functions of his job” is not evidence that the job was unreasonably unsafe
• finding that plaintiffs “testimony is not evidence that his job was unreasonably unsafe or that [the railroad] required him to perform that job in an unreasonably unsafe manner.”
• plaintiff must prove defendant knew or should have known of dangerous working conditions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).