Skip to main content
· 9/22/1992

Lewis v. Barnett Bank

Citations

  • 604 So. 2d 937
  • 1992 WL 235343

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that on a motion to dismiss, the trial court is necessarily confined to the well-pled facts alleged in the four corners of the complaint is not authorized to consider any other facts
  • “The law is well settled that a motion to dismiss a complaint is not a motion for summary judgment in which the court may rely on facts adduced in depositions, affidavits, or other proofs.”
  • “The law is well settled that a motion to dismiss a complaint is not a motion for summary judgment in which the court may rely on facts adduced in depositions, affidavits, or other proofs.”
  • “On a motion to dismiss, the trial court is necessarily confined to the well-pled facts alleged in the four corners of the complaint.” (citing Pizzi v. Cent. Bank & Trust Co., 250 So.2d 895, 897 (Fla.1971))
  • “On a motion to dismiss, the trial court is necessarily confined to the well-pled facts alleged in the four corners of the complaint and contrary to the defendant’s argument, is not authorized to consider any other facts....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hubbart, Nesbitt and Jorgenson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.