Skip to main content
· 10/24/2018

Lewis v. B-3 Prop.

Citations

  • 258 So. 3d 107

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding language of the ballot summary suggesting the amendment was necessary to prohibit casinos in the state was “misleading not because of what it says, but what it fails to say”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lobrano

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.