Lewis v. Alderman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that one is presumed to know the law and cannot “in legal contemplation be deceived by erroneous statements of law”
• “[t]he vendor and vendee of property are not, by virtue of such fact, placed in a confidential relationship to each other, but on the contrary are presumed to be dealing at arm’s length”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).