Lewis v. Adams
Citations
- 70 Cal. 403
- 11 P. 833
- 1886 Cal. LEXIS 802
Syllabus
<p>Findings — Statute of Limitations. —A finding that all the allegations of the complaint are true is a sufficient finding on a plea of the statute of limitations, if the complaint contains averments showing that the statute had not run.</p> <p>Joint Judgment — Action on against Joint Debtor—Amendment — Statute of Limitations. — Where an action on a judgment against several joint debtors is originally commenced against one of them alone, a subsequent amendment to the complaint, by inserting the names of the other judgment debtors as defendants, does not change the nature of the action against the original defendant, nor extend the running of the statute of limitations in his favor until the filing of the amendment.</p> <p>Id.—Foreign Judgment—Review of Error.—In an action on a judgment rendered in another state, error in the manner of entering the judgment will not be reviewed.</p> <p>Id.—Foreign Executrix—May Sue Personally on Foreign Judgment. — A foreign executrix may maintain an action in this state in her individual name on a judgment recovered by her as executrix in another state on a debt due to her testator.</p> <p>Id.—Averments of Official Capacity—Surplusage.—In such an action, the averments in the complaint of the official capacity of the plaintiff are mere surplusage, and may be disregarded.</p>
Judges: McKinstry
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Jones v. WiltonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1938-01-26· cited 27×
- Smith v. CimmetCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2011-10-18· cited 26×
- Wheeling v. Financial Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal· 1962-03-07· cited 25×
- Walker v. McCuskerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1887-01-25· cited 25×
- Fox v. TayCalifornia Supreme Court· 1891-05-30· cited 23×
- Moore v. PettyEighth Circuit· 1905-01-18· cited 19×
- Farmers & Merchants Trust Co. v. MadeiraCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1968-04-23· cited 18×
- Humphreys v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1889-12-02· cited 15×
- Robertson v. StaedSupreme Court of Missouri· 1896-06-23· cited 13×
- Bond v. Farmers & Merchants National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1944-06-14· cited 11×
- Siegal v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1962-04-27· cited 9×
- Tittman v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Missouri· 1891-10-15· cited 9×
- Hare v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1912-01-02· cited 4×
- Mitsui Manufacturers Bank v. TuckerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1984-02-24· cited 3×
- Noyes v. BarnardNinth Circuit· 1894-05-28· cited 3×
- Arizona Cattle Co. v. HuberArizona Supreme Court· 1893-01-28· cited 2×
- Low v. HornerHawaii Supreme Court· 1896-11-30· cited 2×
- Holiway v. WoodsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1983-06-16
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.