Skip to main content
· 5/12/1913

Lewis Publishing Co. v. Wyman

Citations

  • 228 U.S. 610
  • 33 S. Ct. 599
  • 57 L. Ed. 989
  • 1913 U.S. LEXIS 2404

Syllabus

<p>The admission of a magazine to second-class mail privileges on the petition of the owners made pending a suit to'enjoin the enforcement of an order excluding the magazine from such privileges renders the .contentions of plaintiff moot and it is no longer in a position to ask for an injunction.</p> <p>When the question involved in a bill becomes moot, the court should not retain the bill in order to determine plaintiff’s liability on a bond, it not appearing in this case that plaintiff is in any danger from an action to enforce the bond.</p> <p>A suit, which has become moot, will not be retained in order to detérmine appellant’s liability on bonds, when there is nothing in the record on which the rights of the parties may be adjudicated.</p> <p>A suit, which has become moot, will not be retained in order to secure an accounting for amounts paid after its commencement, when it appears on the face of the bill that plaintiff in order to recover far larger amounts paid prior to the commencement of the suit, must bring' an action at law in which all amounts paid could be in-eluded.</p> <p>An order made by the Postmaster General admitting a magazine to ' second-class mail privileges on certain conditions, made pending a suit to enjoin an order excluding the magazine, is a matter of administration, and affords no ground for relief in the suit for injunction against enforcing the order of exclusion, or for retaining that .suit after it has become moot by reason of such order.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • sustaining a regulation which limited the number of free \sample copies\ for distribution at second-class rates in order to effectuate the paid-subscriber requirement
  • sustaining a regulation which limited the number of free “sample copies” for distribution at second-class rates in order to effectuate the paid-subscriber requirement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pitney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.