Skip to main content
· 6/2/2016

Lewis, Marcus Jamez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiff’s belief of shareholder fraud based on a $10 million discrepancy was objectively unreasonable
  • holding plaintiff failed to show protected activity under SOX where plaintiff merely complained that sales quota was unattainable
  • adopting the Sylvester “reasonable belief” standard without specifying a level of deference
  • adopting Sylvester without specifying a level of deference

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.