· 6/2/2016
Lewis, Marcus Jamez
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that plaintiff’s belief of shareholder fraud based on a $10 million discrepancy was objectively unreasonable
- holding plaintiff failed to show protected activity under SOX where plaintiff merely complained that sales quota was unattainable
- adopting the Sylvester “reasonable belief” standard without specifying a level of deference
- adopting Sylvester without specifying a level of deference
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.