Skip to main content
· 7/27/1970

Lewis M. Wagner v. Reading Company

Citations

  • 428 F.2d 289

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding for new trial on damages after holding that exclusion of plaintiff's evidence of wage records, which related only to damages issue, was prejudicial error
  • remanding for new trial on damages after holding that exclusion of plaintiff 's evidence of wage records, which related only to damages issue, was prejudicial error
  • interest under Federal Employer Liability Act on any award at new trial, which is limited to damages, runs from date of original judgment where delay in final assessment was caused by defendant’s objection to improperly excluded evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Van Dusen, Kalodner, Van Dusen Fullam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.