Skip to main content
· 2/6/1997

Federal Case

Citations

  • 106 F.3d 45
  • 37 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 30
  • 35 V.I. 560
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 2008

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying res judicata where “the same facts that resulted in the earlier judgment have caused continued damage”
  • applying res judicata where \the same facts that resulted in the earlier judgment have caused continued damage\
  • applying res judicata where “the same facts that resulted in the earlier judgment have caused continued damage”
  • applying res judicata where “the same facts that resulted in the earlier judgment have caused continued damage”
  • finding res judicata where the same set of facts from an earlier judgment caused continued damage
  • quot- ing Sendi v. NCR Comten, Inc., 624 F. Supp. 1205, 1207 (E.D. Pa. 1986)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.