Lewis' Adm'r v. Glenn
Citations
- 84 Va. 947
- 6 S.E. 866
- 1888 Va. LEXIS 170
Syllabus
<p>1. Corporations —Trust deeds—Subscriptions—Assignee— Case at bar.—The National Express Company executed in Virginia a trust deed of all its estate, including money payable on assessments, to trustees for benefit of its creditors, requiring payment of all its debts, hut reserving enjoyment for a specified period. This deed was shortly afterwards ratified by a meeting of the stockholders. A decree entered in a creditors’ suit against the company, to which, however, the stockholders were not parties, made an assessment, or call, for thirty per cent, on all subscriptions, substituted the plaintiff for the original trustees, and authorized him to collect such assessments by suit or otherwise:</p> <p>Held :</p> <p>1. The trust deed must be construed by the laws of Virginia and is valid.</p> <p>2. It passed title to all unpaid subscriptions, with power to collect same to extent of call.</p> <p>3. The decree binds not only the company, but the stockholders also, whom the plaintiff, as such trustee and assignee, may, under, and also independently of, Code 1873, ch. 141, sec. 17, sue in his own name, for the amount of the call on their subscriptions.</p> <p>2. Idem—Evidence—Stock-books—Subscriptions—Case at bar.—In the case here, held, that the evidence sufficiently identifies certain books introduced by plaintiff as books of the corporation; that those books are admissible as evidence in the action against the deceased’s estate; and that they, with the other testimony, afford satisfactory proof that the deceased was a stockholder, her subscription having been made in her lifetime by her authorized agent.</p> <p>3. Idem—Statute of limitations—Assessment.—Under Code 1873, ch. 57, sec. 3, the statute of limitations begins to run against an action for unpaid assessment, only from the time such assessment is made.</p> <p>4. Practice in Chancery—Service of Process.—Under Code 1873, cb. 166, sec. 7, a return of summons in a suit, made by the sheriff, showing proper service upon
Judges: Richardson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- First Virginia Bank-Colonial v. BakerSupreme Court of Virginia· 1983-03-11· cited 135×
- Stone v. Ethan Allen, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia· 1986-11-26· cited 46×
- Ralph Seymour & Burford Buick Corp. v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Virginia· 1953-03-09· cited 29×
- Hale v. HardonFirst Circuit· 1899-05-31· cited 22×
- Lynch v. JacobsenUtah Supreme Court· 1919-10-09· cited 18×
- In Re Martinez' WillNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1942-05-21· cited 16×
- Glenn v. HuntSupreme Court of Missouri· 1894-02-19· cited 12×
- Hudson Motor Car Co. v. HertzSixth Circuit· 1941-06-25· cited 9×
- Mercer v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia· 1929-06-13· cited 8×
- Morrow v. Vaughan-Bassett Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Virginia· 1939-09-13· cited 8×
- Evans v. SpurginSupreme Court of Virginia· 1854-07-15· cited 8×
- Roberts v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.W.D. Virginia· 1988-05-12· cited 7×
- Thum v. PykeIdaho Supreme Court· 1901-07-01· cited 7×
- Hardy v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1930-07-05· cited 4×
- Glenn v. LiggettU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri· 1891-09-21· cited 2×
- Glenn v. McAllister's Ex'rsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Virginia· 1891-02-17· cited 1×
- Phippen v. DurhamSupreme Court of Virginia· 1852-01-15
- French v. TownesSupreme Court of Virginia· 1853-10-15
- Foote v. GlennU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey· 1892-09-27
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Sanger v. UptonSupreme Court· 1875-11-29· cited 277×
- Glenn v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1883-03-29· cited 68×
- Crocker v. WhitneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1813-10-15· cited 56×
- Wickham & Goshorn v. Lewis Martin & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia· 1856-08-25· cited 48×
- Milnor v. MetzSupreme Court· 1842-03-18· cited 31×
- Ex Parte CarllSupreme Court· 1883-01-15· cited 28×
- Dance v. SeamanSupreme Court of Virginia· 1854-10-15· cited 19×
- Boyd v. Chesapeake & Ohio Canal Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1861-06-20· cited 15×
- Stuart v. Valley R. R.Supreme Court of Virginia· 1879-09-18· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.