Skip to main content

Lewellen v. State

Citations

  • 682 So. 2d 186
  • 1996 WL 577279

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding instruction on petit theft was not fundamental error because it was lesser in degree and punishment than grand theft of a motor vehicle
  • holding it was fundamental error to elevate defendant's petit theft conviction to first-degree misdemeanor under section 812.014(3)(b) where information did not allege prior theft convictions
  • finding fundamental error where trial court elevated the degree of the petit theft conviction without regard to any prior conviction, misclassifying the offense as first-degree, as opposed to a second-degree misdemeanor
  • since definition of petit theft excludes certain items, including automobiles, petit theft cannot be considered lesser included offense of grand theft auto

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fulmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.