Skip to main content

Lewandowski v. State

Citations

  • 483 S.E.2d 582
  • 267 Ga. 831
  • 97 Fulton County D. Rep. 1253
  • 1997 Ga. LEXIS 143

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a psychologist’s expert testimony about the defendant’s mental state was properly excluded as irrelevant to his claim of voluntary manslaughter
  • holding that a psychologist's expert testimony about the defendant's mental state was properly excluded as irrelevant to his claim of voluntary manslaughter
  • holding that psychological evidence regarding the effect of the victim’s conduct on the defendant’s mental state at the time of the killing was properly excluded as irrelevant to a voluntary manslaughter defense
  • holding that psychological evidence regarding the effect of the victim’s conduct on the defendant’s mental state at the time of the killing was properly excluded as irrelevant to a voluntary manslaughter defense
  • holding that psychological evidence regarding the effect of the victim’s conduct on the defendant’s mental state at the time of the killing was properly excluded as irrelevant to a voluntary manslaughter defense
  • OCGA § 16-5-2 provides an objective standard; “[i]t is of no moment whether the provocation was sufficient to excite the deadly passion in the particular defendant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hines

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.