Levy v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that genuine issue of fact existed as to whether store negligently created danger when it used lightweight, unsecured floor mats on a windy day
• observing that “slip and fall” analysis applied in a claim involving a negligently placed door mat
• stating, in another context, that “[a] plaintiff is the master of her own claim”
• ORCP 47 E affidavit proper if contention is “susceptible to proof through expert testimony”
• as framed by plaintiff, the question was whether door posed an “unreasonable danger”
• recog- nizing the declaration’s utility in furthering Oregon’s use of “trial by ambush”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).