Levu v. Employment Department

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• department plausibly construed and applied “poor judgment” standard under OAR 471-030-0038(3)(b) as excluding crime of dishonesty for off-the-job conduct
• “In making our inquiry into whether claimant’s off-duty conduct is ‘connected with work,’ we have generally looked at whether claimant’s off-duty conduct had any actual impact in the workplace.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).