Skip to main content
· 3/10/2005

Levitt v. District of Columbia Office of Employee Appeals

Citations

  • 869 A.2d 364
  • 2005 D.C. App. LEXIS 50
  • 2005 WL 612670

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding to OEA for an evidentiary hearing where employee provided detailed allegations of improper employment actions
  • reversing OEA’s dismissal of employee’s appeal of RIF for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and remanding for evidentiary hearing on employee’s claim of pretext

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schwelb and Reid, Associate Judges, and Kern, Senior Judge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.