Skip to main content
· 5/15/1996

Levitin v. Homburger

Citations

  • 932 F. Supp. 508
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6695
  • 1996 WL 262995

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing plaintiffs claim relating to the propriety of the sale with leave to replead them in state court
  • explaining the two exceptions to Rooker-Feldman and noting that fraud is not one of them
  • “To the extent that Levitin considered this form of notice insufficient, his complaint is with [the state court] justice .”
  • plaintiff should seek remedy in state court, rather than federal court, to undo challenged judgment because \[i]t is settled law that a court has inherent power to vacate its own judgment on proof that fraud has been perpetrated on the court\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sotomayor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.