Levisa Coal Co. v. Consolidation Coal Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an objection was preserved when it was submitted “in the written objections submitted to the court prior to the entry of the final order”
• holding that an objection was preserved when it was submitted “in the written objections submitted to the court prior to the entry of the final order” (emphasis added)
• holding that an objection was preserved when it was submitted “in the written objections submitted to the court prior to the entry of the final order” (emphasis added)
• writing that “the granting of an injunction is an extraordinary remedy and rests on sound judicial discretion to be exercised upon consideration of the nature and circumstances of a particular case.”
• “[W]hen the terms of a contract are clear and unambiguous, a court must give them their plain meaning.”
• “[IJnjury is deemed irreparable and the owner protected in the enjoyment of his property whether such be sentimental or pecuniary.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).