Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
· 11/17/1955

Levinson v. Evening Star Newspaper Co.

Citations

  • 138 F. Supp. 947
  • 1955 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2272

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that Rule 4(f)(2)(C) had to comply with the law prescribed by the foreign country, then it would be superfluous to Rule 4(f)(2)(A)
  • stating that Rule 4(f)(2)(C) had to comply with the law prescribed by the foreign country, then it would be superfluous to Rule 4(f)(2)(A)
  • stating that Rule 4(f)(2)(C) had to comply with the law prescribed by the foreign country, then it would be superfluous to Rule 4(f)(2)(A)
  • stating that Rule 4(f)(2)(C) had to comply with the law prescribed by the foreign country, then it would be superfluous to Rule 4(f)(2)(A)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McLaughlin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.