Levine v. Shackelford, Melton & McKinley, L.L.P.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “pattern of ignoring deadlines and warnings from opposing party amounts to conscious indifference”
• holding that, in a default judgment setting, a pattern of ignoring deadlines and warnings from opposing party amounts to conscious indifference
• holding that, in a default judgment setting, a pattern of ignoring deadlines and warnings from opposing party amounts to conscious indifference
• holding that, in a default judgment setting, a pattern of ignoring deadlines and warnings from opposing party amounts to conscious indifference
• holding that defendant was consciously indifferent when it was in regular contact with the court, promised to make certain filings and appear, but then did not fulfill those commitments
• upholding default judgment when parties’ attorney had a pattern of ignoring deadlines and warnings from the opposing party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).