Levine v. Roebuck

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a correctional officer did not violate the defendant's Fourth Amendment rights because he was not personally responsible for the catheterization
• holding that a correctional officer did not violate the defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights because he was not personally responsible for the catheterization
• noting that prison inmates have a lesser expectation of privacy than others in our society
• refusing to consider as fact the district court's inference that a prison official ordered an involuntary catheterization where the inference was not supported by the record
• officers who committed Fourth Amendment violation by unlawfully catheterizing prisoner were entitled to qualified immunity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).