Levine v. Michell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the plaintiffs' challenge was \sufficiently collateral that the Court has jurisdiction over both the constitutional and statutory claims\
• holding § 1254a(b)(5)(A) does not strip court of jurisdiction to consider equal protection, substantive due process, and APA claims
• holding plaintiffs plausibly alleged violation of the APA where a new policy was made and the agency showed no good reasons for the new policy
• holding the Arlington Heights standard applies to TPS terminations of Haiti, El Salvador, and Honduras, and that claims would nonetheless survive rational-basis review
• finding that § 1254a(b)(5)(A) did not bar a challenge to DHS’s “new policy” 17 allegedly applied across three different TPS determinations
• in similar TPS case, largely denying government's motion to dismiss

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).